Proposed air quality Directive: Assessment of the Environmental impact of Parliament’s amended proposal, Policy Brief for the EP Environment Committee, IP/A/ENVI/FWC/2005-35.

Air quality limit values for Particulate Matter (PM) proposed by the European Parliament, Commission and Council may not be attainable in time. Even with maximum technical feasible reductions and additional traffic policies in urban areas it remains uncertain if the proposed PM-values can be realized by 2020 everywhere in Europe. This follows from an assessment by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP) of the impact of the proposed changes in the Air Quality Directive, at the request of the European Parliament.
Proposed air quality limit values possibly not attainable
In the past months, the European Commission, Parliament and Council have all made proposals for tackling air pollution. It appears that it is not feasible to meet the proposed limit values for PM everywhere in Europe in time. The proposed limit values are not consistent with the European ambitions to reduce emissions. Even assuming full implementation of maximum technical feasible reductions and additional traffic measures in urban areas, timely attainment of limit values everywhere in Europe will not be certain. Even the proposed possibilities for derogation offer no solution. Exceedances of the proposed limit values can still occur in the Po-valley, the Benelux-countries, the Ruhr area, in areas in southern and eastern Europe and in several large cities in other countries.
Multiple limit values could hamper enforcement
The daily and annual limit values for PM10 and PM2.5 partly overlap. In the proposals of European Commission, Parliament and Council the limit values for PM10 remain the most binding restriction in polluted urban areas. This is surprising as WHO has pointed at PM2.5 as being more relevant for health damage. Only if a correction for natural sources of PM was allowed, would the limit value for PM2.5 as proposed by Parliament become the most stringent one. The multiple and partly overlapping air quality standards could hamper policy enforcement and there may be a risk that the intended improvement of environmental conditions will not occur. A similar implementation of measurement strategies and methods among member states is already difficult.
Benefits likely higher than costs
Particulate Matter is associated with premature death, morbidity and hospital admissions. Indications exist that the health benefits exceed the costs of the emission reduction plans of Commission and Parliament. However uncertainties in these estimates remain high.
| Bibliography | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 14-09-2006 |