This new international climate mitigation regime eliminates two concerns often voiced in relation to gradually converging per-capita emissions. First, emission reduction obligations in advanced developing countries are delayed and reduced compared to emission reduction obligations in Annex I countries, and second, this regime does not lead to excess emission allowances.
Authors
Hohne N ; Elzen M den ; Weiss M
Date
15 January 2007
Publication
Clim Policy 2006; 6(2):181-99
Remark
This article describes a new concept for an international climate regime for differentiation of future commitments: the ‘common but differentiated convergence’ approach (CDC). Under CDC, Annex-I countries’ per-capita emission allowances converge within a convergence period to a low level. Individual non-Annex-I countries’ allowances converge to the same level also within the same period (‘common convergence’), but starting when their per-capita emissions are a certain percentage above global average (‘differentiated’). Until then they may voluntarily take on ‘positively binding’ targets. This approach eliminates two concerns often voiced in relation to gradually converging per-capita emissions:
Even if the CDC approach is not implemented in its entirety, it is possible that the step-by-step decisions on the international climate regime can be guided by the principles provided in the CDC approach.