Logo of the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
To the main menuTo the main content

A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation

Article | 13-05-2019

Holding the global increase in temperature caused by climate change well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, the goal affirmed by the Paris Agreement, is a major societal challenge. Meanwhile, food security is a high-priority area in the UN Sustainable Development Goals, which could potentially be adversely affected by stringent climate mitigation.

Here we show the potential negative trade-offs between food security and climate mitigation using a multi-model comparison exercise. We find that carelessly designed climate mitigation policies could increase the number of people at risk of hunger by 160 million in 2050. Avoiding these adverse side effects would entail a cost of about 0.18% of global gross domestic product in 2050. It should be noted that direct impacts of climate change on yields were not assessed and that the direct benefits from mitigation in terms of avoided yield losses could be substantial, further reducing the above cost. Although results vary across models and model implementations, the qualitative implications are robust and call for careful design of climate mitigation policies taking into account agriculture and land prices.

Author(s)Shinichiro Fujimori et al. with PBL contributions from Jonathan Doelman and Detlef van Vuuren
Publication date13-05-2019
PublicationNature Sustainability
RemarksThis article is available on the publisher’s website via restricted access.